<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A proposal.</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/04/08/693/</link>
	<description>Resolution, Duty, Inquiry</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kalblog</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/04/08/693/#comment-481</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/04/08/693/#comment-481</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Applause&lt;/strong&gt;
A couple of weeks ago, Pandagon had a post making fun of Justice Rehnquist for complaining about applause in the Supreme Court chamber. Now Andrew Hagen is upset over a similar thing during the 9/11 Commission hearings, because it trivializes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Applause</strong><br />
A couple of weeks ago, Pandagon had a post making fun of Justice Rehnquist for complaining about applause in the Supreme Court chamber. Now Andrew Hagen is upset over a similar thing during the 9/11 Commission hearings, because it trivializes&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
