<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The nature of the Global War on Terrorism.</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Hagen</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-1642</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-1642</guid>
					<description>Radical Islamic backlashes could be contained. 

Anti-minority backlashes can also be contained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical Islamic backlashes could be contained. </p>
<p>Anti-minority backlashes can also be contained.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brady Postma</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-535</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2004 18:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-535</guid>
					<description>I was wondering if you truely believe your plan for a "reciprocal halt" on Muslim immigration to Western nations was a plausible step against the insurgent radicals?  And if so, how will it be accomlished without major, radical backlashes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you truely believe your plan for a &#8220;reciprocal halt&#8221; on Muslim immigration to Western nations was a plausible step against the insurgent radicals?  And if so, how will it be accomlished without major, radical backlashes?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Hagen</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-479</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-479</guid>
					<description>The rules of &lt;i&gt;jihad&lt;/i&gt; are to kill unbelievers on the spot. There is no quarter, mercy, or possibility of conversion. The Muslim category of "unbelievers" includes atheists.

Since other religions tend to tolerate atheists, atheists would be well advised to support the struggle against radical Islam.

I hope I've answered your question, but I'm not sure I have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules of <i>jihad</i> are to kill unbelievers on the spot. There is no quarter, mercy, or possibility of conversion. The Muslim category of &#8220;unbelievers&#8221; includes atheists.</p>
<p>Since other religions tend to tolerate atheists, atheists would be well advised to support the struggle against radical Islam.</p>
<p>I hope I&#8217;ve answered your question, but I&#8217;m not sure I have.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Sanderson</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-477</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewhagen.com/archives/2004/03/24/685/#comment-477</guid>
					<description>Where do Atheists fit into your analysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do Atheists fit into your analysis?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
